CLICK IMAGE and help Red Flag this elitist control freak
WELCOME TO THE NEXT CHAPTER! NOTICE:NO GUNS OR AMMUNTION ARE FOR SALE VIA THIS BLOG.CAVEAT: THIS BLOG CONTAINS (albeit often very childish) ADULT-CONTENT. DISCLAIMER: This blog is a hobby, it is not a livelihood. Entries at this blog are akin to good old-fashioned campfire chats; I offer no opinion on what you should or should not purchase, or what you should be using or doing. What does or does not work for me could be long country-miles away from your tastes and your needs. All products, places, and miscellany that I review for this blog are paid for at retail price by me. I do not accept payment, gifts, discounts, freebies, products on loan, demon alcohol, drugs, plea-bargains, probation, parole, Papal Blessings, Presidential Pardons, or sexual favors for doing any review or blog post. TRACKING COOKIES: Google et al stick tracking cookies on everybody. If you are online, you are being spied on; 'nuff said. You may be able to minimize your online footprints by using Tor and Duck Duck Go. Vive la liberté! Vive all y'all! Ante omnia armari.To each of you, thanks for stopping by!
At a distance (with one of the abandoned lakefront OMC buildings as a backdrop) the wheels on this 16-year-old >178,000 miles (AKA "Clunker") GMC Safari Van look acceptable.
Close up, for the most part, they still look okay.
Now lets remove that durable, non-removable, chrome facia (it is mounted to the steel wheel with an industrial-grade adhesive) and see what is hidden from view.
Yep, on all but one wheel, the steel is rusted clean through in some very critical structural areas.
Not all of the wheels on all of the Chevy Astro Vans and the GMC Safari Vans were made the same way and not all of them have had 16-winters of exposure to road salt, but these wheels certainly do look to be a high-speed-pothole away from causing a serious situation.
The tires on this van are 5-years-old but have less than 15,000-miles on them; there is plenty of tread left. Because of some slow leaks, earlier this year I had the beads on all tires cleaned and sealed; I also had the valve stems replaced. The point being is that a well known, highly respected tire outfit missed the fact that all of the wheels on this particular vehicle were unsafe at any speed.
Although the old tires were salvageable, I decided to order 4 new tires to go with the requisite 4 new wheels.
The 84 FS does kinda look like a shrunken version of the Beretta 92 FS.
If asked to choose a half-dozen models of .380 ACP pistols as my favorites above all other available models of .380 ACP pistols, I would have to decline the request. Of all the different models of .380 pistols that the market has to offer, I have affection for only a very few, the Beretta 84 Cheetah being the most recent (and likely the final) addition to my small but eclectic .380 collection. The Cheetah is intended to be a shooter (as opposed to a "Safe Queen") and a carry piece once I feel comfortable with it at the range, and subsequent to logging substantial time carrying it inside appropriate holsters. It may take up to a year for me to see if this pistol suits me like I believe it will.
Each of the three .380 pistols in the above photo will fit into the side pocket of all brands of my bluejeans. Simply fitting into a pocket does not make a handgun a practical pocket carry. The easiest pocket carry is obviously the Seecamp, followed by the PPK. The Cheetah is akin to pocket carry of the chubby little Glock 26. If the pocket bulge is going to be equal I would likely opt for the 11-round capacity of the more powerful 9x19mm G26 over the 14-round capacity of the 9x17mm Beretta 84. However, for knock-about shoulder holster carry or IWB carry, the Beretta suits me a bit better than does the G26. The Beretta also fits my hand far better than does the G26.
The thumb safety on the PPK flips UP to fire. The thumb safety on the Beretta 84 FS flips DOWN to fire. That would be confusing during a life threatening situation; it is unwise for me to carry both of those pistols at the same time or to frequently alternate carry between those two. The Seecamp has no external safety; it is a simple point-and-click self-defense device. The Seecamp internal safety blocks the trigger when the magazine is removed. The Beretta Cheetah internal safety "disconnects" the trigger when the magazine is removed. The PPK has no magazine safety.
Capacity of each (with a full mag and a round in the chamber):
Beretta 84 FS = 14 rounds
Walther PPK = 7 rounds
LW Seecamp = 7 rounds
The most felt recoil is with the Seecamp and the least is with the Beretta (although, unloaded, the steel frame PPK and the alloy frame 84 FS Cheetah weigh about the same). As far as getting the most velocity out of the .380 ACP, the longer barrel of the Beretta should lead that race followed by the PPK and then the Seecamp.
The Beretta has a bit more sight radius than does the PPK. The Seecamp has no sights whatsoever but many shooters find the stylish little last-ditch-self-defense belly-gun capable of adequate accuracy at surprising distances.
In the above photo, the Walther PPK is stacked on the side of the Beretta 84 FS Cheetah. The Cheetah is a bit longer and a bit taller than the PPK. Sized to fit the 13-round double-stack magazine, the grip of the Cheetah 84 is far thicker than that of the PPK. Although it is a bit more difficult for me to conceal than is the PPK, the added ammo capacity is an attaction and the Beretta is far more comfortable in my hand.