. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Absit iniuria verbis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
He can play all the hardball he likes but he has zero chance of winning the nomination. And in reality, he's not a commie, like most of his Dem comrades. He's a "commie lite". He is NOT conservative no matter what anyone says
He is a 1960-1970's Democrat, which is much better than the current Democrats.
He can play all the hardball he likes but he has zero chance of winning the nomination. And in reality, he's not a commie, like most of his Dem comrades.
ReplyDeleteHe's a "commie lite". He is NOT conservative no matter what anyone says
He is a 1960-1970's Democrat, which is much better than the current Democrats.
ReplyDelete